
Our dedicated team is here to evaluate, plan, and manage your complex healthcare business functions, allowing your team to concentrate on what matters most – patient care.

At MedHQ, we empower our healthcare clients to focus on what they do best. We have over 30 years of experience providing advisory and administrative solutions to help facilities achieve growth goals, efficiently provide specialized operational functions, and recruit and retain talented team members.

Throughout the United States, we partner with hospitals/health systems, outpatient healthcare/ambulatory surgery centers, and physicians/provider groups to offer comprehensive advisory and administrative solutions.
In a non-equity model, the ASC management company provides operational services under contract: services like business office administration, accounting, and compliance oversight, with human resources (HR) and revenue cycle management (RCM) typically available as add-ons. In exchange, it collects a management fee, typically structured as a flat monthly rate, a percentage of collections, or some combination of the two.
The management company has no ownership position in the ASC. It has no equity stake, it isn’t entitled to a distribution when the center is profitable, and it has no claim on proceeds if the ASC is sold. Its compensation is tied solely to the services it delivers, not to equity appreciation.
In an equity-based management model, the management company takes a minority or majority ownership stake in the ASC, often in exchange for capital, services, or both. That stake gives the management company a claim on profit distributions and on any future sale, and it usually comes with governance rights that scale with ownership percentage.
| Category | Non-Equity Management | Equity-Based Management |
|---|---|---|
| Ownership | None; owners (e.g., physicians, health systems) retain 100% | Management company holds a partial or majority stake |
| Compensation | Management fee (flat, percentage of collections, or hybrid) | Fee plus profit distributions tied to ownership share |
| Governance | Retained by existing owners | Shared or controlled based on equity stake |
| Exit | Terminate or renegotiate the management agreement | Buy out or sell the management company’s equity stake |
| Capital contribution | Typically none required from the management company | Often includes a capital investment |
The right fit depends on whether the owners want to raise capital and share long-term value, or whether they want operational expertise without giving up ownership. Non-equity management has grown in popularity and gained credibility in recent years and is now often the preferred ASC management model.
Scope varies by contract, but non-equity management agreements commonly cover:
Two services are usually structured as add-ons rather than folded into the base management fee. Revenue cycle management is typically available at preferential rates for management clients. HR is typically optional as well, often delivered through a PEO (professional employer organization) arrangement that handles payroll, benefits administration, and HR compliance for the center’s staff. A well-structured agreement spells out exactly which services are included, which are optional, and which decisions still require owner approval.
The owners do. Since the management company holds no equity, it has no independent authority over strategic decisions like case mix, physician recruitment, capital expenditures, or a future sale of the center. Those decisions stay with the ASC’s board or governing body, made up of the physician and health system owners.
The management company operates within the scope the owners define in the contract. It can bring recommendations, run the day-to-day operations, and flag issues that need owner attention, but it doesn’t have a vote.
Fee structures vary by market and scope of services, but the most common approaches are:
The fee should scale with scope. A center that contracts for the full range of services, HR and RCM add-ons included, will pay more than one that limits the agreement to a narrower set of core functions. Owners evaluating proposals should ask for a clear breakdown of what’s included at each price point rather than a single bundled number.
Non-equity management isn’t necessarily the lower-cost option. When the scope of services is comparable, management fees often land in a similar range to what an equity partner would charge. The difference is what owners give up to get there: an equity stake and a share of future proceeds versus a largely similar fee for services rendered.
Several factors are driving the shift toward greater surgery center independence:
Note: For more on this trend, see “Non-equity ASC management is redefining what owners should expect” in Becker’s ASC Review, or watch the on-demand webinar “Why more ambulatory surgery centers are rethinking equity-based management,” featuring Avanza + MedHQ CEO Erik Miller.
Non-equity management tends to fit best for centers that are already capitalized, or that have access to their own capital, and want strong operational and financial management without changing who owns the business.
The exception is ASCs that need significant capital investment, such as a new build (de novo surgery center) or a major expansion. Those centers may be better served by an equity partner who can fund that investment in exchange for a stake.
If you’re weighing whether a non-equity structure fits your center, look closely at what’s included, what’s optional, and who keeps the final say on strategy and spending. Avanza + MedHQ works with physician owners, hospitals, health systems, and academic medical centers to lay out exactly what a non-equity management relationship would look like for your ASC, with no equity involved and no obligation to move forward.
The challenge is aligning strategically without turning an ASC into a mini-hospital. Hospitals guide strategy, not operations. ASCs are fast, physician-led, and efficient. Let them work the way they work.
– Geri Eaves, Vice President of Ambulatory Services